[nltk_data] Downloading package stopwords to /root/nltk_data... [nltk_data] Package stopwords is already up-to-date!
This document processes the outputs of the praise reward system and performs an analysis of the resulting token reward distribution.
Since praise gets valued on a scale, we can take a look at how often each value of the scale gets assigned by quantifiers. Note: This metric disregards scores of praise marked as a duplicate, since the score of the original is already being taken into account.
The ten highest rated contributions for this round were the following:
| Avg. score | To | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 125.666666666667 | carlos096 | for working tirelessly to solve the crazy latency & 404 issues we had yesterday with the dapp. you guys stayed up soo late and worked so hard to get things up and running as quickly as possible, and this is HUGE effort annd makes a big difference for all our projects & donors - thank you! |
| 107.333333333333 | Amin#2164 | for working tirelessly to solve the crazy latency & 404 issues we had yesterday with the dapp. you guys stayed up soo late and worked so hard to get things up and running as quickly as possible, and this is HUGE effort annd makes a big difference for all our projects & donors - thank you! |
| 96.0 | Amin#2164 | For being the person who I can directly connect to and resolve complex urgent problems on the spot. It's like our minds talk to each other and we have telepathy. Keep it up bro :) |
| 96.0 | Amin#2164 | for making huge progress on DeVouch development, Amin added in project information into the back-end endpoint and Cherik had a front-end Demo with a first peek of the website using the front-end designs! Amazing dev work from them both |
| 89.0 | Amin#2164 | for developing very insightful Dune dashboards 👏👏 |
| 84.6666666666667 | Tosin#8012 | for their work on the design for DeVouch, having lots of meetings and doing some very dedicated work this week on finishing the wireframes and moving into final design |
| 84.6666666666667 | divine_comedian#0 | for the myriad of things they are doing, between QF rounds, DAO opsing, community handling you hold a lot of the ropes and I am very grateful for you being our strong core |
| 84.6666666666667 | ramramez#0 | For non stop refactoring, he really cares about the performance and code quality and makes lots of improvements each day |
| 84.6666666666667 | carlos096 | for being available round the clock fixing issues, guiding others in the team for QF, helping product to get clarity and documentation, helping QA for bringing right expectations from data perspective .. all this while taking care of unpredecitable personal errands like taking care of his dog , who recently had an eye operation!! You fixing 1-2 issues for QF everyday and guiding others is creating huge impact for the QF and Giveconomy users!!!\ |
| 82.0 | griffgreen#0 | for literally dropping everything to help with a Stellar / Giveth integration grant proposal, which included everyone working over the weekend. We should have it across today and tomorrow....then we watch the magic. |
We can now take a look at the distribution of the received praise rewards. You can toggle the inclusion of the different sources by clicking on the legend.
We can also take a look at the amount of praise different users gave.
Now for something more fun: let's surface the top "praise flows" from the data. Thanks to @inventandchill for this awesome visualization! On one side we have the top 15 praise givers separately, on the other the top 25 receivers. The people outside the selection get aggregated into the "REST FROM" and "REST TO" categories.
Now let's take a closer look at the quantification process and the quantifiers:
To aid the revision process, we highlight disagreements between quantifiers.
This graphic visualizes controversial praise ratings by sorting them by the "spread" between the highest and lowest received score.
Please keep in mind that this is a visual aid. If there are several praise instances with similar spread and quant score, all but one end up "hidden" on the chart. For an exhaustive list, take a look at the exported file "praise_outliers.csv" .
Let's see how different quantifiers behaved by showing the range of praise scores they gave.
To interpret the box plot:
Bottom horizontal line of box plot is minimum value
First horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is First quartile or 25%
Second horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is Second quartile or 50% or median.
Third horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is third quartile or 75%
Top horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is maximum value.
Among 1236 praises, 179 (14.48%) do not agree on duplication
Praise instances with disagreements in duplication are collected in 'results/duplication_examination.csv'. To compare, look at the last 4 columns: 'DUPLICATE MSG 1/2/3' and 'ORIGINAL MSG'.
Among 1236 praises, 8 (0.65%) do not agree on dismissal
Praise instances with disagreements in dismissal are collected in'results/dismissal_disaggreed.csv'. You can further look into who dismissed and who did not.